Political reactions to the Chernobyl accident slowed or stopped many nuclear programs, indirectly contributing to an increase in pollution.

By Paul Segalard

Following the Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union (April 26th, 1986), public opinion turned against nuclear energy in many countries. [1][2] The accident at reactor 2 of Three Mile Island in the USA in 1979 had already sown doubts about the technology, despite zero health impacts and a very low environmental impact. Seven years later, Chernobyl occurred … Continued

The nuclear industry has learned nothing from Fukushima

By Alexandra Even

The significant feedback from the accident made it possible to further improve nuclear safety in Japan and the rest of the world.  After the Fukushima accident, the Japanese nuclear safety agency was dissolved and then refounded. [1] New safety standards were presented in July 2013, concerning the design of reactors, protection against earthquakes and tsunamis, … Continued

WHO is subordinate to IAEA

By Alexandra Even

The 1959 Agreement While the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) both belong to the UN, they are two separate international organizations, each with its own objectives and areas of expertise. WHO is responsible for protecting and promoting global public health, while IAEA ensures the safe and peaceful use of … Continued