Misconceptions

There is no safe radiation threshold.

Incomplete
The health effects associated with exposure to low doses of radioactivity remain controversial. The effects of low doses, if any, are so small that they have not yet been confirmed. By adopting the "linear no-threshold” dose-effects model, radiation protection organizations are making a deliberately conservative choice to protect populations.
Read more

Nuclear subcontractors receive the highest levels of radiation exposure

Biased
Nuclear subcontractors, like operator employees, may be exposed to radiation, but exposure levels are strictly regulated and controlled to ensure their safety. There is no distinction made among workers, regardless of the companies they work for.
Read more

Japanese food products became dangerous after Fukushima

Misleading
The negative image around food produced in Japan has weighed heavily on the Japanese economy and on local producers who still struggle to make a living from their production, which nevertheless conforms with consumer standards.
Read more

It would have been preferable not to evacuate the people of Fukushima immediately

True
Research today questions the extent, suddenness, and duration of the evacuations around Fukushima, whose impact on the health of the populations concerned would ultimately be more severe than the effect of radioactive discharges if these people had remained at home or returned more quickly.
Read more

Fukushima has caused thousands of deaths due to radiation

False
Radioactive releases from the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant accident resulted in such low population exposure that 15 years later no casualties have been recorded and no observable increases in cancers or deaths are expected.
Read more